Due Torri Presuppositional Falling One criticism of the Koran s theology

Due Torri Presuppositional Falling One criticism of the Koran s theology For many years, Muslims, as developed for the first time, the Christian thought, he thought the relationship between different aspects of dogmatic theology (sometimes also referred to as "Kalam"). Like the confession of faith of Westminster (1646) accurately reflect the system of theology in the Scriptures, their theology of Christ (Christology), for example, behave properly with his doctrine of Scripture. This is an example of what it means to prove that the Bible is "the [mutual] consent of all its parts." This is not the case with Islam. Two important points, the Islamic theology, it is logically impossible that [not only two points, there are also many others, but only two are here], and so idolatrous, thereby distorting the nature of a living and true God. At each location, to shortcomings of these first showing Islam in a particular disorder, the logic of the conditions for the meaning of the world. This doctrinal authors names. The first peak is called Islamic? Tanzih? (say Tawni-zuh) and the second? Tawhid? (TAU-sensitive). A. Tanzih. This doctrine emphasizes the absolute 'other-ness "(that kind of philosophy as" transcendence ") of God." In the Koran there is a proverb that "God is very different to every creature." Here, Islam differs radically from the biblical and historic Christian theology, which would be the word "together" in the preceding sentence. In the Bible, God on His creation, in some points (called his incommunicable attributes, "because only in this one), but God remains, as the institution in other ways (the His attributes). For example, the biblical doctrine, the man has it (and) that to God? S image. This requires a type then? Analogy of being? (? Analogy ENTIS • For Latin Junkies), however remote, between God and man. In this context, it is crucial not God? Quite unlike any creature. Thus, the false doctrine of tanzih means: Since God is wise, and totally different from all other creatures, no creature is therefore advisable. This would mean, of course, that Mohammed was a madman - an unacceptable impact on all Muslims. It would also be an idiot of angels (very unlikely), and men such as Solomon, and all the prophets. This proposal, then? Tanzih? clear is whether the Bible? two thumbs down.   Secondly, because God is able to read and write, tanzih creature means that we can not do. This, of course, that the Quran [Koran] completely impossible, or at least unnecessary. There is little sense of God to go through a lot of problems for his word to men in written form, if he was not selected as one of them a read.Third, the doctrine of tanzih means that man can not be created after the image of God created, how is earlier.In confirm that man is created after the image of God created and God is altoghether unlike any creature, Islam is presented as a self-refuting, and only people that religion. The Gospel of Christ, on the other hand, says that the establishment (especially men), reflects the characteristics of God, and in this way God is with men. God created man in His own image, so that later [after the fall of man into sin], it would be possible for God to become a man, to redeem us.Here, we see the clarity and consistency to the Gospel Christ, through the stupidity of Islam in one important point that Islam includes a diverse network of deceit.Now we are on the doctrine of absolute Tawhid.Islam teaches units (units) of God, as a means to try to obtain through against the various forms of polytheism. But this is clearly a case of "excessive compensation", as can be seen from a logic on this critical issue. Unlike the doctrine of tanzih, here, God has a universe of "His eteal power and divine nature" (Romans 1:19-20). This is why we are sometimes the universe (a Greek word for "Rules") as "universe". "University" means that the unity of many things ( "pour"), which we are living in this world, the world also shows the unity and diversity among the various parties. In philosophy, this simple fact there is a problem? The inputs and the Many. How can you explain how it is that this unity and diversity to work together to give us a single common experience of the world? How can the world (cosmos), to unify, in all its variety of things out there? Nature Nature in all its diversity (we have dogs and cats, cars and trucks, sand and mud, trees and flowers, etc.) nor uniform (so that the same laws of physics apply to all others like them) - even on the moon? The answer is a Christian right: God is in connection with his divine nature, and many in connection with his personality. This is the biblical doctrine of the Trinity. This is, of course, not a contradiction in terms. The appeal must mean (o), both A and not A, in the same direction and at the same time. Christians believe that God is one (in terms of A = his divine nature) and that many of God (in terms of his personality = B) so that the three divine persons are really God.This says why Nature demonstrates both the unity and diversity: The Creator, who is at the same time, and many, after creation, and reflects his character, but also a unity and a "many-ness" about them (because of the Christian world), solves the problem of entry and many do not pay the philosophers in the history of the world was able to help do.And Islam is not even here. First, the doctrine of the Koran tanzih any analogy between creation and Creator, Tawhid says that, even if such an analogy would not be any different - that would be the creation of a monolithic "one" - a complete unit with diversity. This would facilitate the creation of something (for example), as a large block of cement or a big stone. If the institution, in fact, as these suggest that lessons have been derived from the human experience, since "the people", not by any other adjective.Therefore, the fact that we have one thing is evidence of the truth of Christian faith and the denial of an illusion of Islam - together with other false religions (such as Roman Catholicism and Buddhism), which ultimately can not explain everything. Their basic requirements are not fulfilled the necessary conditions (such as the diversity and unity of the cosmos) to the human experience intelligible.And any of the world (including all forms of agnosticism and atheism), that does not understand the world us, is not in itself a meaningful picture of what the world is how we know what we know and how we should live our lives. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the truth, which is why you've just explained all three aspects of human experience just mentioned - with the consent of all its parts. "This is what is meant when Christians say," Sola Scriptura! "And because the correct phrase ends with an exclamation point. And those who sing? God is great? I do not know half of what they say, because it is much larger than the Qu? you would have us believe. The opposite is impossible.Carson day, approximately 1.3 gazillion articles and essays on all kinds of topics. These are intended to offer to God and really help people to live well and wisely. Visit the websites in Carson (The Omniblog where everything Carson blog) or (Carson's Day Trading Outpost). Thanks for stopping by.