Theosophy and Blavatsky experts

Theosophy and Blavatsky experts Blavatsky? S Babuino: The Theosophical Society in Pasadena found this book popular in the West face of the Guru tradition be fun, but prone deception. This is only the author (Peter Washington), who has refused to correct or deal with many errors and omissions, even in the second printing. Here are a problem. Errors and omissions (listed in sequential order): Pages 34e-35b: "According to Blavatsky, the last description of the Frateity, this hierarchy is headed by Lord of the world, who lives in Shamballa in the Gobi Desert. (11) The Lord of the world, was bo before Venus with more aid and now lives in the body of a sixteen. In descending order of authority, her assistants are the Buddha, Mahachohan, Manu and Maitreya .. .. "Manu is the initial visitor assistant Blavatsky, Master Mory, often simply referred to as Master or Mr. M special service in the distribution of cosmic responsibility is to chair the qualities of power and strength, particularly as regards the direction of nations. . . . Maitreya is the assistant to the Master Koot Hoomi ... Including the most recent incaations include Pythagoras .... He is a co-culture, a linguist and a musician whose work takes control of religion, education and art .... [Etc, etc] "Commentary: misinformation, misattribution, clear the use of secondary and tertiary sources; undocumented (Chapter 11 is a reference note for Shambhala René Guénon and Marco Pallis). This description is misleading, they are not in the writings of Blavatsky, but back in May of a different tradition, experience shows that among the Blavatsky Theosophists many years after his death in 1891. A scientist theosophic reasonably aware of the history and doctrine do not confuse the two. Peter Washington (PW) makes very little description of Theosophy, as presented by HPB and teachers, and what is not often inaccurate or out of context (see footnote on page 406 below). (1) What he said Mr. Washington may be inaccurate in detail, but its readers to find the Master completely assembled rather ludicrous notion that he does not consider it necessary to address the Theosophical Society. But it is not right to discuss about the nature of the hierarchy of Theosophists and their roots are just under development or is it saying? In defense of Mr. Washington, let me say that the question of what the name of the master is mounted on the author or this? it is not, with the exception of a nit-picker resolve a few days. It 'clear that the Theosophists hierarchies to promote these and many other sects or religions. But Mr. Washington goes too far, eliminating the possibility for people to benefit by contact with such knowledge. Blavatsky and Akashic without truth are not treated very well, I think. I probably agree with the position that Mr. Theosophical Washington is engaged in a witch hunt and marks of all the guru tradition unfairly because they do not understand the truth of these things in all religions. But I believe that the agenda is ecumenical Theosophist or not coming. However, one thing Blavatsky was just the fact that all the religions (so called mode? Absolue By Francis Fukayama declares with pride that the social, as engineers are used as tools) are the same group of elite people? which includes the whole world. Yes, people on earth were the interpenetration of trade and the long jouey before Hinduism existed.Author of many books and the World-Mysteries.comArticle Source: